Exposure at default (EAD)

IFRS 9 EAD versus regulatory EAD

Avoid carrying a prudential conversion factor into accounting measurement without reconciliation.

Visual summary of IFRS 9 EAD versus regulatory EAD: Avoid carrying a prudential conversion factor into accounting measurement without reconciliation.
A visual overview of Avoid carrying a prudential conversion factor into accounting measurement without reconciliation. See the guide for assumptions and implementation details.

Purpose

Compare the purposes and context of exposure measures used in accounting and capital frameworks.

Hover over or focus a term for a quick definition, or open its glossary entry.

  • Forward-looking information
  • Default
  • IFRS 9

Key definitions

  • IFRS 9 measures expected credit losses using cash-shortfall concepts and forward-looking information.
  • Basel IRB risk components support regulatory capital calculations and have prudential minimum requirements.
Formula
Accounting ECL may be scenario-weighted by period; regulatory expected loss and capital formulas use framework-specific PD, LGD, and EAD inputs.

Worked example

One revolving account can have different EAD estimates for lifetime accounting cash flows and a prudential capital exposure under prescribed rules.

Detailed explanation

The acronym EAD appears in multiple frameworks, but a shared label does not guarantee shared measurement. Regulatory IRB estimates are part of a capital framework with defined default, data, and parameter requirements. IFRS 9 ECL is an accounting measurement that considers expected cash shortfalls, time value, and reasonable and supportable forward-looking information.

Where institutions reuse systems, data, or model components, document the purpose-specific changes: horizon, scenarios, contractual expected life, CCF treatment, discounting, and default definitions. Reconcile differences rather than forcing equality. Consult the applicable standard and supervisory rules for the institution and jurisdiction; this educational comparison is not an implementation checklist.

Try a reproducible Python example

These examples use synthetic inputs and run locally in a browser worker. Edit the code, run it, and compare its output with the published example.

Runnable Python · local in your browser

Estimate revolving EAD with a CCF

Apply a hypothetical conversion factor to the currently undrawn facility limit.

Output

Run the code to see the output.

Runtime loads only after you press Run. Code runs in a separate browser worker with a 10-second limit and a 20,000-character output cap. Use synthetic examples only; browser execution is not a secure environment for secrets or sensitive records.

Runnable Python · local in your browser

Summarize rating migration, arrears roll, and recovery LGD

Use synthetic account paths to calculate grade transitions, a delinquency roll rate, and a simple discounted recovery outcome.

Output

Run the code to see the output.

Runtime loads only after you press Run. Code runs in a separate browser worker with a 10-second limit and a 20,000-character output cap. Use synthetic examples only; browser execution is not a secure environment for secrets or sensitive records.

Assumptions

  • The reporting framework, portfolio, horizon, and contractual treatment are identified before comparing measures.

Limitations

  • There is no universal conversion from regulatory EAD to IFRS 9 exposure paths.
  • Institution-specific bridges require governance and documentation.

References

Educational material only. Methods and examples are simplified; state and validate the assumptions required for your use case.

IFRS 9 EAD versus regulatory EAD | CreditRiskHub